Strength Performance Network

These are three very important strength and mass builders. However, I
continually see much controversy about how they should be performed.
What is the general consensus on proper back alignment during these
exercises?


The spine has a natural curve to it which is kyphotic for the thoracic and lordotic for the lumbar. Flexing the hips by contraction of the abdominal muscles flattens out the lumbar spine and relieves its
natural lordosis.


I was taught to always have my back flat while lifting and this can be done by keeping one's shoulders retracted (according to one coach) However, being taught to either sit back, or bend at the hips and not
the lower back was how I learned the majority of my lifts. Which I
believe is correct and allows you to flatten the back.


What do you all think?

Views: 44

Replies to This Discussion

I don't think you "flex the hips by abdominal muscles" in any of these lifts. Flexing the hips is done as a result of the eccentric contraction by the hip extensors resisting the force of gravity of the load. As a result, the abdominal muscles don't "flatten out the lumbar spine" the way you mention. The spine should be kept in the neutral position ("natural curve") statically during these lifts in my opinion.

Retracting the shoulders helps to keep the thoracic spine in its "natural curve" since this resists the protraction taking place as a result of the load being held in the hands (deadlift, bent over row).

It would be great if we can have discussions like this more often with other UWL students, faculty sharing knowledge and experience. With that said, what do others think about Drew's question.
I am going to have to agree in that keeping the back flat (maintaining its natural curvatures) should be of first and foremost importance in these such lifts. Not only does it allow for proper recruitment and loading of the major muscle groups (be it any of the 3 lifts) but it also loads the spine and pelvis in a safe and effective means to transfer force from the external load to the body system (back, hips, legs).

I also agree with Glenn in that with a deadlift the hamstring/glutes and and hip extensors act much more as a breaking force (eccentric) as the weight is brought back to the ground. In the back squat the quads/hip flexors and abdominals ("core" in general) come into play more significantly due to bar position being on the back (more posterior then a deadlift which is in front of the body.

Bottom line as I see it, in the a big picture (not one joint) you have a compressive force to work against with a back squat vs a pulling (traction??) force with a deadlift which changes the way the leverage system works on the body and the recruitment/stability needed to perform the lift. (Maybe thats why I can deadlift 100lbs more than a squat........?????)

As for bent rows, I find them helpful simply because they help balance out all the work most athletes get with upper body pushing movements already.
When it comes to flexing the hips to flatten the back out the coach I am hearing this from believes that back extension is bad because it loads the neural arch too much and may lead to injury. Which makes sense in extreme extension but not extension used in training. I think that is where he is coming from at least. Make sense?
Back extension here I assume is "trunk extension" and the opposite of that is trunk flexion. If you do trunk flexion in any of these exercises, injury will definitely follow. How does this coach propose to do any of these lifts without trunk (back) extension.
By keeping the abs turned on and relaxing the back. He believes the motor pattern which we were all taught of chest up and hips back is incorrect. Personally I believe with any of these lifts that if the load is heavy enough your abs will be firing in order to stabilize. I don't see the need to overemphasis keeping your abs turned on.

Another perspective which I have heard is that injury from say deadlifting probably would not come from having a flexed back but being flexed and going automatically into extension. This makes sense, but why not just keep it neutral and avoid hyperflexion and hyperextension.

RSS

Photos

Loading…
  • Add Photos
  • View All

Blog Posts

Going Through The Motions

Posted by Vern Gambetta on May 12, 2013 at 9:05am

Fun Workouts?

Posted by John Mikula, MA, CTRS, CSCS, HFS on May 8, 2013 at 8:37pm

Discussion Forum

Hamstrings...to stretch or activate

Started by Andrew Lee Feb 11, 2010.

Deadlift, Squat, Bent over row 5 Replies

Started by Andrew Lee. Last reply by Andrew Lee Feb 18, 2010.

© 2013   Created by Brian Harris.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service