Strength Performance Network

A Different Angle on Agility Part II

I quickly realized that Part I of this post may have been confusing. Here are my reflections:

1) I make it sound that agility drills shouldn't be used.
2) In the beginning, I say you don't have to teach agility to get someone quicker.
3) I somehow compare agility to golf, which is just confusing in general.
4) I mention that Barry Sanders probably never had a speed coach - therefore I make it sound like speed coaches aren't necessary.

All in all - horrible post. But hopefully I can clarify.

1)Improving someone's time in an agility drill doesn't necessarily mean you've prepared them with skills that will transfer beyond that drill. It's not about time and reps. Is about learning and executing technique.

2)Drills and agility equipment are good things. I know the ladder gets a bad rep sometimes - but I believe it's one the most practical, space efficient tools for teaching technique.

3)Barry Sanders was Barry Sanders because he was stronger, more explosive, better conditioned AND understood how to arrange his feet around his body in order to start, stop and change direction. He combined technique with the physical qualities necessary to move like he did.

Training for agility is not just about timing someone through a configuration of cones. That is a tool that can be used for evaluation, but more importantly it should be the integration of sound fundamentals.

To me, improving someone's agility is to teach them how to arrange their legs around their torso and aim their feet at the ground in order to prepare to move in a given direction (see: Barry Sanders). I like to think of this as Multidirection Ground Preparation. The athlete learns how to prepare for the ground, to react to the ground, to "catch" the ground.

The focus becomes "How can I arrange my body in order to push against the ground the most efficient way possible in order to get me where I want to be going?" Once you teach an athlete to "react" like such, and teach them the fundamentals of multidirectional movement, cone and ladder drills become much more effective, because whether the equipment was there or not, the athlete is performing the drill in a way that will reflect how they'll move on the field.

There are some great demonstrations of this type of teaching and integration on Scotty Moody's website www.athletefit.com - under the featured video sections.

Views: 27

Comment

You need to be a member of Strength Performance Network to add comments!

Join Strength Performance Network

Comment by Jeremy Boone on April 7, 2009 at 5:16pm
Joe,
Enjoyed your post! A few follow up questions/comments to your second post:

1. Totally agree with you. To take it a step further though agility is specific to the sport and position of the athlete you are working with. Checkout my recent blog post titled 'Speed In A Box'

2. Regarding ladders, what specific technique are you referring to? This could go a number of different ways!

Ground preparation (linear or lateral) is definitely important when improving speed and agility skills. Again though, coaches should be careful to not try and fit every athlete into the same mold! (see my #1) There are quite a number of athletes (both youth and professional) that I would have made a lot slower if I had made them fit the 'ideal technique' mold.

Glad you checked out Scott's site! Great stuff!

Call me sometime this week if you get a minute!

Jeremy
www.athletebydesign.com

© 2019   Created by Brian Harris.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service