Sport is a fluid, dynamic, challenging, unpredictable combination of movements all taking place in a chaotic environment. A sound functional assessment looks at the key elements that we can identify and measure and then matches those up with the physical competencies. Determine where each individual stands and design an appropriate training program that prepares for the demands of the sport. Not everyone is created equal, not everyone will start at the same place on the exercise progression continuum. That is where the assessment is most valuable, it helps to place the individual at the appropriate starting point based on their physical competencies. Use this as an advantage to meet individual needs. There should be little or no need for so called “corrective exercise” because the training is designed to take advantage of the individual’s strengths and minimize their weaknesses.
The actual assessment should not be sterile and artificial. It should incorporate a variety of movements in multiple planes that will give a clear picture of the athlete’s physical literacy. It is not designed to generate random numbers with no context and therefore no meaning. Count what counts and then make it count with appropriate training that provides measurable and visible results. Don't get caught up in nuance, cut to the chase. Determine key performance indicators. Assess exactly what needs to be assessed to determine the status of the individual relative to the key performance indicators. Periodically reassess to determine progress and gains in functional movement literacy. Modify training to reflect adaptation. At the conclusion of the training program based on the functional assessment you should have a highly adaptable athlete completely prepared to perform in the competition arena.
Comment
Comment by Joe Locascio on April 13, 2012 at 12:09pm I do agree that a sport specific functional assessment is very valuable as part of a complete training program. However, I believe creating a stable and mobile base for this type of assessment is even more crucial. If the athlete has asymmetries or muscle imbalances, no functionally demanding assessment will reach its full potential as these red flags for injury will not be addressed. For example, if the athlete has valgus knee tendencies and they go right into fluid, dynamic, challenging, unpredictable combination of movements, the body will not teach the knee to stay in proper alignment, it will continue doing what is comfortable, putting stress on the medial ligaments and meniscus over and over again. By not skipping the corrective exercise phase of a training program. we increase the quality of any workout, decrease likelihood of injury and extend the athletes carrier but eliminating unnecessary internal stress.
Comment by Justin Giger on April 9, 2012 at 11:18am Great write-up. I've adapted the idea that there is no such thing as "corrective exercise." Exercise is "reinforcing" (for better or worse). It is up to the practitioner to ensure they are employing the appropriate exercises to reinforce proper movement patterns and ultimately meet the needs of the client/athlete. Some don't consider the idea that doing a "corrective exercise" can potentially harm their athletes if the proper foundation for movement, strength, and control have not been established.
Posted by Vern Gambetta on May 12, 2013 at 9:05am
Posted by Dave Schall on May 10, 2013 at 1:17pm — 4 Comments
Posted by John Mikula, MA, CTRS, CSCS, HFS on May 8, 2013 at 8:37pm
Started by Lenny Taylor May 14.
Started by Bobby Dattero May 13.
Started by John W Henderson May 2.
© 2013 Created by Brian Harris.
You need to be a member of Strength Performance Network to add comments!
Join Strength Performance Network