Strength Performance Network

Some days in training athletes have record-setting days and other days athletes have atrocious performances, but regardless of what type of day it is a common theme prevails: their training demands on the
spot adjustments to the training program. Too often, we are too tied
into our written workouts and training templates to realize that it is
okay, at times, to shut things down.


If an athlete is unable to maintain a high level of performance, some modification must take place. As a coach, you can dial down the scheduled load by altering volume, density, or intensity or you can
progress them to a motor task that is similar yet not as technical. In
the case of a shot putter, for example, if he is unable to hit the
necessary criteria on a full competition style throw, it can be dialed
down to less specific and demanding by reducing the approach or even
executing throws from the front of the ring. If this is not working
well and there is a volume to be upheld, then dropping further to a
multi throw can help accomplish similar effects without destroying the
motor engram necessary. In competition phases, quality should
typically take precedent over reaching a scheduled volume, thus, a
coach may choose to simply move onto the next module once quality falls
off.


The athlete who is having a record-setting workout may also demand some modifications as well. Depending on the intensity of the workout and the time of year, several choices can be made. Take, for example,
a sprint athlete running intensive tempo reps during GPP. This athlete
may be running a workout at record paces, and the time of year will
allow him to continue pushing. The same goes for special endurance II
work even closer to competition. However, a record setting performance
in 80 or 100m sprinting for an athlete with advanced training age and
performance levels during a workout demands careful consideration as to
continue training or not. Typically, backing off after said
performances is a wise choice to allow the athlete to stabilize his new
performance level without undue stress on the system.


The same ideas can easily be applied to strength and conditioning and distance running with a bit of thought. If an advanced athlete shows remarkably improved loading numbers, it is okay to move him into
the next training component without beating him into a pulp. Likewise,
we should be cautious in deciding if we will use the new personal best
as the number off of which to base our intensities until the athlete
has stabilized said level of performance.


Remember, in athletics, personal records in training mean very little. What means most is an athlete who can hit personal records in competition.


Regards,

Carson Boddicker

Boddicker Performance

Views: 27

Comment

You need to be a member of Strength Performance Network to add comments!

Join Strength Performance Network

© 2019   Created by Brian Harris.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service